tutorial-title

America is the largest, most diverse society on the planet, and our medical system reflects that. We spend almost US$2 trillion per year on healthcare, nearly one in every seven dollars in the economy, yet we are still one of the few nations where all citizens do not automatically have medical coverage. For many Americans, health insurance is a perk most often tied to their job, or it comes as a result of a government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. It is ironic that the United States, a nation that spends the most money per capita on healthcare, and has the most technologically advanced medical system in the world, is not the healthiest society on earth.

Some 47 million U.S. residents have no health insurance, and the numbers keep growing. Because employers increasingly are moving in the direction of providing Wal-Mart-style health coverage by shifting health care costs to employees, America’s workers struggle to pay higher premiums, deductibles and co-payments — if they can afford such coverage at all. Employers are responding to growing cost pressures by shifting more and more health care costs onto workers, especially through larger co-pays and deductibles that must be paid at the time treatment is sought.

Single-payer national health insurance is a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health financing, but delivery of care remains largely private. Under a single-payer system, all Americans would be covered for all medically necessary services, including: doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs. Patients would regain free choice of doctor and hospital, and doctors would regain autonomy over patient care.

One of the most socialized systems of universal health care is the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom, which was established in the wake of World War II, in 1948. Every facet of medical care is covered entirely from tax revenues, so that patients need not pay at all, either into a general insurance fund or in direct fees to a medical provider. Medicines, meals, lodging, and services are all provided, as are incidental costs such as outpatient care and equipment. In the past the NHS was criticized for offering a fairly low quality of health care, and for extended wait times for service. Since the late 1990s the government has invested substantially more money in the NHS, modernizing it drastically and bringing it up to a par with the rest of Europe. The NHS has also begun to interact more heavily with the private sector, often outsourcing entire segments of health care to non-governmentally controlled interests.

I’m satisfied with my insurance company and my MEDICAL care. why should i support HR 676 and universal health care?

Although you might be satisfied with your medical care, 45.7 American citizens remain without health care, either because it is not affordable to them, or because they were turned downfor insurance because of pre-existing conditions. This means that 15% of Americans are only one accident or illness away from bankruptcy, forced to risk both their lives and their financial stability. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, proclaimed that "everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of oneself and one's family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care." Where as every other industrialized nation has adopted a form of single-payer system, the for-profit health care system of the United States is unable to provide coverage for all its citizens.

WON’T UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE COST TOO MUCH?

As it is, America spends more money per capita on health care than any other nation. Right now, there are thousands upon thousands of "payers"-- HMOs, PPOs, bill collection agencies, etc. The sheer volume of paperwork required by our current system means that administrative waste accounts for roughly 31% of the money spent on health care. The single-payer system would eliminate the wasteful paperwork and administrative costs, redirecting more of our health care dollars to providing care.

WON’T GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE RESULT IN An over-controlling state?

Taxes, fees and benefits would be decided by the insurer which would be under the control of a diverse board representing consumers, providers, business and government. It would not be a government controlled system, although the government would have to approve the taxes. The system would be run by a public trust, not the government. Single payer, universal health care administered by a state public health system would be much more democratic and much less intrusive than our current system. Consumers and providers would have a voice in determining benefits, rates and taxes. Problems with free choice, confidentiality and medical decision making would be resolved.

WILL I STILL BE ABLE TO CHOOSE WHO MY DOCTOR IS?

There would be free choice of health care providers under a single payer universal health care system, unlike our current managed care system in which people are forced to see providers on the insurer’s panel to obtain medical benefits.

ISN'T GOVERNMENT RUN CARE LESS EFFICIENT THAN CORPORATE FOR-PROFIT CARE?

Private for profit corporation are the lease efficient deliverer of health care. They spend between 20 and 30% of premiums on administration and profits. The public sector is the most efficient. Medicare spends 3% on administration. The quality of health care in the US has deteriorated under managed care. Access problems have increased. The number of uninsured has dramatically increased (increase of 10 million to 43.4 million from 1989 to 1996, increase of 2.4% from 1989 to 1996- 16% in 1996 and increasing each year).

FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE SOURCES

A Case For Universal Health Care   Single Payer FAQ   H.R. 676 FAQ

Over 31% of every health care dollar goes to paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc. Because the U.S. does not have a unified system that serves everyone, and instead has thousands of different insurance plans, each with its own marketing, paperwork, enrollment, premiums, and rules and regulations, our insurance system is both extremely complex and fragmented.

H.R. 676, also called the United States National Health Insurance Act, is a bill to create a single-payer, publicly-financed, privately-delivered universal health care program that would cover all Americans without charging co-pays or deductibles. It guarantees access to the highest quality and most affordable health care services regardless of employment, ability to pay or pre-existing health conditions.

The U.S. could save enough on administrative costs with a single-payer system to cover the uninsured: H. R. 676 would save the nation $400 billion dollars.

And only you can make it happen


1. LEARN MORE ABOUT H.R. 676

Here are some helpful links to valuable resources!

Full Text of HR 676 Extensive Overview
FAQ HealthCare-NOW! Addressing Myths

2. WRITE A LETTER TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE

Feel free to use one of our sample letters, but make the letter even more impactful by adding details about your own experiences with the health care system.

4. SPREAD THE WORD

Tell all your friends and send them to this website for an introduction to universal health care.